October 27, 2020 •
I’d like you to think about something: What, in your mind, is going to be the next mass exploitation of cardholder data affecting the secure e-commerce of small and medium online retailers? What simple mistake or mistakes are being consistently made by these retailers that will lead to the next rash of mass theft of credit card data?
We’ve actually just seen a sign of the coming attacks. In just one weekend last month, nearly 3,000 individual e-commerce stores were breached in a concerted Magecart-style e-skimming attack. What did these stores have in common? They were all still running end-of-life, free and open source software.
E-skimming is an attack on cardholder data within the browser itself, usually through the compromise of one or more third-party dependencies. In this case, known vulnerabilities in Magento v1—which was deprecated in June 2020—were combined with a remote code execution exploit and made available to cybercriminals for a mere $5,000 US dollars.
Increasing adoption of EMV technologies for card-present transactions makes online sites more attractive to cybercriminals. In addition, COVID-19 has led to reduced merchant resources for secure e-commerce—and bad actors know it.
Three primary concerns coming from these issues are poor vulnerability management, continued use of end-of-life software, and failure to understand how turnkey e-commerce tools can be exploited. Each of these are under the online retailer’s direct control and should be addressed immediately.
The first step to ensuring your website is using a secure e-commerce implementation is understanding how your online payment acceptance process is just one part of your site’s overall security. Secondly, you must determine how your implementation fits into the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS), including eligibility to complete a self-assessment questionnaire (SAQ) or having a Qualified Security Assessor (QSA) complete a report on compliance (ROC).
Finally, when completing a reduced SAQ, it is imperative that you as a merchant understand how your implementation may still have residual risk with respect to vulnerability management and third-party risk management. Using this understanding, you must implement preventative and detective controls to mitigate that risk.
The following are four common e-commerce implementations, each with its own security, compliance, and user experience advantages and disadvantages:
The easiest and most secure e-commerce implementation is redirecting customers to a third-party payment service provider (PSP) to perform all payment form, transmission, and processing generally qualifies for SAQ A. But, because fewer security controls are required to be in place, attacks to the merchant’s site can allow the attacker to redirect the customer to a fake payment page instead.
This is similar to the first scenario, but the hosted payment page is embedded within an IFRAME on the merchant’s site. This approach can provide security around the capture, transmission, and processing of cardholder data; however, if the IFRAME is not properly implemented, or if the attacker is able to redirect the source of the frame to a fake page, card data can still be compromised.
While less common on new implementations, this payment flow gives all control of the payment form to the merchant, but offloads transmission and processing to the payment service provider. To ensure a secure e-commerce form, the merchant must take full responsibility for secure coding requirements and ensure that the PSP is providing appropriate authentication to detect or prevent a man-in-the-middle attack.
I put together an educational webinar to walk through these common e-commerce implementations, complete with demonstrations of attacks that can be carried out against each. In the webinar, I explain the advantages and disadvantages of each method, how they relate to PCI guidance, and the additional monitoring steps that can be performed to minimize risk of data theft.
Click here to access the free webinar, “E-Commerce Exploits Merchants and PSPs Need to Watch For.”